- Published on
Founders ko Bhadka diya ? Sharks ne #startup #business #marketing #sharktank
Founders ko Bhadka diya ?? Sharks ne #startup #business #marketing #sharktank
Shauks set fire to the founders and even wanted a person from Team Tudva to join them.
In time, a brand emerged which makes clothes and they started their sale 7 months ago. Today it is recognized from a road, having sold a lot and accumulated more than 1 lakh followers on Instagram. All their traffic syrup is coming from their website, and the reason behind their success is marketing, with one particular individual spearheading all efforts.
However, beneath this success lies a significant problem. This individual only holds 10% equity. Concerns were raised that this seems unfair, suggesting that equity should be equally distributed between both founders. Despite these concerns being voiced, they went largely unnoticed. The founders continued their discussions about equity, with the second partner being somewhat agreeable to more than just 10%.
The crux of the issue dates back to when the company started, with zero initial investment from the one holding 10% and an investment of Rs 50 lakh from the person holding 90%. The contentious debate is that equality in equity does not drive sales; however, a more balanced ratio like 30:70 might be fairer.
Keywords
- Shauks
- Team Tudva
- Clothing brand
- 7 months
- Followers
- Marketing
- Equity
- Founders
- Rs 50 lakh
- 30:70 ratio
FAQ
Q1: Who initiated the equity dispute among the founders?
A1: Concerns about unequal equity were voiced by an individual who holds only 10% of the equity.
Q2: What is the primary cause of the founders' success?
A2: The primary causes are marketing and the efforts of the individual behind it.
Q3: How long has the clothing brand been active in sales?
A3: The brand started its sales 7 months ago.
Q4: How much initial investment was made by the main shareholder?
A4: The main shareholder made an initial investment of Rs 50 lakh.
Q5: What equity distribution ratio is suggested to be fairer?
A5: A ratio of 30:70 is suggested to be fairer than the current distribution.